State v. Radka’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2021
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Mendez · State v. O'NEILL · State v. Parker · 137 Wash. 2d 208 - State v. Mendez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he test is whether a reasonable detainee under these circumstances would consider himself or herself under full custodial arrest.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]ppellate court examinations of the issue of custodial arrest following McKenna have retreated from the consideration of the arresting officer's intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Glenn“[T]he determination of custody hinges upon the `manifestation' of the arresting officer's intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gering
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.