State v. Gurske’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2005
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 122 Wash. 2d 270 - State v. Valdobinos · 11 Wash. App. 21 - Fite v. Lee · State v. Schelin · 44 Wash. App. 444 - State v. Sabala · 80 Wash. App. 217 - State v. Mills
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n a criminal case wherein there has been a special allegation and evidence establishing that the accused . . . was armed with a deadly weapon at the time of the commission of the crime, the court shall make a finding of fact of whether or not the accused . . . was armed with a deadly weapon at the time of the commission of the crime[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gurske
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.