Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 P.3d 12 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Commonwealth · State v. Carlson · Peters v. State · State v. Rastopsoff · Gonzales v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As we explained in Smith, [prior Alaska cases on this point] demonstrate an important presumption of Alaska law: before a defendant's sentence can be enhanced based on a prior offense, the government ordinarily must prove that the defendant was judicially confronted with his prior misconduct and was given an opportunity for reformation before the defendant committed the current offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.