State v. Goodman’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
73 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably State v. Pillatos (2007), State v. Yates (2007)
73 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Ring v. Arizona · Harris v. United States · Hagner v. United States · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he identity of the controlled substance is an element of the offense where it aggravates the maximum sentence ....”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pillatos · State v. Powell“`(1) do the necessary facts appear in any form, or by fair construction can they be found, in the charging document; and, if so, (2) can the defendant show that he or she was nonetheless actually prejudiced by the inartful language which caused a lack of notice?'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pry · State v. Rivas““Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McNeal · State v. Evans
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.