Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 S.D. 424 - Starnes v. Stofferahn

Starnes v. Stofferahn’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
3
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably Nelson v. Nelson Cattle Co. (1994), Westover v. East River Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (1992)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 43 state decisions

200196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bartlett v. Gregg · Parham v. Dell Rapids Township in Minnehaha County · Kundert v. B. F. Goodrich Co. · Ford v. Robinson · Ford v. Mount Tom Sulphite Pulp Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘Contributory negligence is conduct for which plaintiff is responsible, amounting to a breach of duty which the law imposes upon persons to protect themselves from injury, and which, concurring and cooperating with actionable negligence for which defendant is responsible, contributes to the injury complained of as a proximate cause.’”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Where the evidence establishes that the plaintiff was beyond reasonable dispute guilty of negligence more that slight it is the duty of the court to direct a verdict for the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.