Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 So. 2d 105 - Arnold v. State

83 So. 2d 105 - Arnold v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2010

20 state decisions

601955196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Mayo · Rebjebian v. State · Wilson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There can be no doubt that the crime of robbery necessarily includes the crime of larceny, the difference primarily being that robbery is an aggravated form of larceny involving force and violence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.