Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 SO2D 148 - Whitlock v. Veith

Whitlock v. Veith’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
November 1969
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 18 La. App. 697 - Meyers v. Acme Homestead Ass'n · Davis-Wood Lumber Co. v. Farnsworth & Co. · Geo. L. Ducros Tile Co. v. Frey Homes, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The fact that defendant’s check was for an amount admitted to be due does not prevent its acceptance — when tendered with the stipulation that the payment constituted a full settlement— from constituting an accord and satisfaction.” Mall Tool Co. v. Poulan, La. App., 40 So.2d 512 . See also Berger v. Quintero, 170 La. 37 , 127 So. 356 ; Whitlock v. Veith, La.App., 83 So.2d 148 ; Meyers v. Acme Homestead Ass’n, 18 La.App. 697 , 138 So. 443 ; Davis-Wood Lumber Co., Inc. v. Farnsworth & Co., Inc., La.App., 171 So. 622 ; Thompson v. Stacy, La.App., 148 So. 2d 834 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.