Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 SO2D 150 - Hernandez v. Ethyl Corp.

Hernandez v. Ethyl Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 1977
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1977

8 state decisions

60195519601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 251 (Employee Commuting Flexibility Act of 1996)

Relies on Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Tennessee Coal Iron Co v. Muscoda Local No 123 Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co · Armour & Co. v. Wantock · General Electric Co. v. Porter · Crescent City Live Stock & Slaughter-House Co. v. Larrieux

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.