Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 So. 2d 692 - Sumerel v. Pinder

83 So. 2d 692 - Sumerel v. Pinder’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2014

5 state decisions

301955196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Broadnax v. Ledbetter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I am personally guaranteeing a $1,000,-000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of anyone involved in the planning or execution of President Kennedy’s murder, or for information which makes it possible for the truth to come out.... To aid in this public campaign to solve JFK’s murder, call or write to Americans for a Free Press, 40 W. Gay St., Columbus, Ohio 43215, telephone (614) 228-0877. An independent panel of experts and judges, including Ralph David Abernathy (SCLC), Mark Lane, Dick Gregory, Lillian Smith, and Robert Groden, will determine the appropriate recipient or recipients of the reward.... Time is crucial. We must act now.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.