83 So. 3d 178 - State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 2024
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Crawford v. Washington · Hernandez v. New York · Allen v. United States · Purkett v. Elem
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(l)Except as provided in Article 412, evidence of other crimes, ■ wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order, to show that he acted in conformity therewith, It may, however, be admissible , for other purposes, such as proof of. mo-five, opportunity, intent, - preparation, plan, knowledge, ■identity, absence of mistake or accident, provided that upon request by the accused, .the prosecution in a criminal case shall provide reasonable notice in advance of trial, of the nature of any such evidence it intends to introduce at trial for such purposes, or when it relates to conduct that constitutes an integral part of the act or transaction that is the sübject of the present proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A mistrial is a drastic remedy and, except in instances in which a mistrial is mandatory, is warranted only when trial error results in substantial prejudice to defendant, depriving him of a reasonable expectation of a fair trial. Whether a mistrial should be granted is within the sound discretion of the trial court and the denial of a motion for mistrial will not be disturbed absent an abuse of that discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Upon motion of a defendant, a mistrial shall be ordered when a remark or comment, made within the hearing of the jury by the judge, district attorney, or a court official during the trial or in argument, refers directly or indirectly to: [[Image here]] (2) Another crime committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant as to which evidence is not admissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.