Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

83 So. 3d 749

Stacey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-07-08

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 2014

3 state decisions

Relies on Fugina v. Fugina

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-07-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 We affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences for conspiracy to traffic in 200 grams or more of methamphetamine; trafficking in 200 grams or more of methamphetamine; possession of listed chemical; and tampering with physical evidence. On each of these counts the circumstantial proof was sufficient to support the jury verdict. Based upon double jeopardy grounds, we vacate the conviction and sentence for manufacture of methamphetamine. Ford v. State, 749 So.2d 570 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

¶2 AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART.

GRIFFIN, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
/83/so3d/749 · .json · Public domain