83 So. 3d 906 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 634 So. 2d 607 - Novaton v. State · State v. Gray · 990 So. 2d 1098 - Barron v. State · 867 So. 2d 409 - Coicou v. State · 898 So. 2d 163 - Dallas v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Finally, the State contends that [Williams] ■ suffered no prejudice from his counsel’s failure, if any, because the State could simply have amended the information to correct any defect.- This argument is unpersuasive. The facts presented below cannot support both a charge of attempted felony murder and attempted armed robbery, and no amendment of the information can correct this defect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.