Alsina v. Gonzalez’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 629 So. 2d 817 - Kozel v. Ostendorf · Ham v. Dunmire · 873 So. 2d 519 - Bank One, NA v. Harrod · Bennett Ex Rel. Bennett v. Tenet St. Mary's, Inc. · 951 So. 2d 959 - Smith v. City of Panama City
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) Whether the attorney’s disobedience was willful, deliberate, or contumacious, rather than an act of negligence or inexperience; 2) whether the attorney has been previously sanctioned; 3) whether the client was personally involved in the act of disobedience; 4) whether the delay prejudiced the opposing party through undue expense, loss of evidence, or in some other fashion; 5) whether the attorney offered reasonable justification for noncompliance; and 6) whether the delay created significant problems of judicial administration.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.