Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

83 So. 3d 979

KULO v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2012-03-23

Decided 2012-03-23

PER CURIAM.

¶1 We affirm in all respects. We remand, however, for correction of a scrivener’s error. The order reflects that the appellant violated conditions of probation 6 and 8. The record demonstrates, however, that he was found to have violated condition 5 and a special condition concerning attendance at AA meetings. The order on remand should be corrected as indicated.

¶2 AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PALMER, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
/83/so3d/979 · .json · Public domain