Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 SW2D 732 - Kleising v. Miller

Kleising v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 1989
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 1989

7 state decisions

20193519401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Royalty v. Strange · Block v. Fertitta · Cardwell v. Austin · Baptist Church of Madisonville v. Webb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The test to be applied in determining whether the trial court is authorized to instruct a verdict is whether there is any evidence which, when considered by itself, would, if accepted as true by the jury, raise a fact issue. Thomas v. Postal [Telegraph-Cable] Company (Tex.Com.App.) 65 S.W.2d 282 ; Stinnett v. [Gulf, C. S. F.] Railway Co. (Tex.Civ.App.) 38 S.W.2d 615 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.