Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 SW3D 18 - Flavan v. Cundiff

Flavan v. Cundiff’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp. · Klemme v. Best · Chocktoot v. Smith · Donahue v. Shughart, Thomson & Kilroy, PC · Charles Reinhart Co. v. Winiemko

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “include with each point relied on, 'a list of cases, ... and the constitutional, statutory, and regulatory provisions or other authority upon which that party principally relies”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “not matters of first impression and precedent is available, with limited exceptions, the appellant must cite to authority if it wishes to prevail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Appellate courts should not serve as an advocate for any party on appeal, and unfairness would inevitably result if the rule were otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.