Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 U.S. 147 - Carlisle v. United States

Carlisle v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

83 U.S. 147 · 1872

Citation profile

145
cited by 145 later decisions
30
cited 30 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 16 district · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 145 later decisions (30 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2022 · most notably Sorrells v. United States (1932), Wong Wing v. United States (1896)

27 federal appellate · 16 district · 41 state decisions — followed in 16 states

2201872188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 145 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not to be supposed that Congress intended by the general language of the act to encroach upon any of the prerogatives of the President, and especially that benign prerogative of mercy which lies in the pardoning power.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is true, the pardon and amnesty do not and cannot alter the actual fact that aid and comfort were given by the claimants, but they forever close the eyes of the court to the perception of that fact as an element in its judgment, no rights of third parties having intervened. There has been some difference of opinion among the members of the court as to cases covered by the pardon of the President, but there has been none as to the effect and operation of a pardon in cases where it applies. All have agreed that the pardon not merely releases the offender from the punishment prescribed for the offence, but that it obliterates in legal contemplation the offence itself.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “By allegiance is meant the obligation of fidelity and obedience which the individual owes to the government under which he lives or to his sovereign in return for the protection he receives.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.