Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 U.S. 159 - James v. Milwaukee

James v. Milwaukee’s Empirical Analysis

83 U.S. 159 · 1872

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
9
cited 9 times by the Supreme Court
March 1962
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (9 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1962

8 federal appellate ·

501872188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cammack v. Lewis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendant in error insists that the power conferred was confined to companies already in existence at the date of the act, and such was the opinion of the court below. We entertain a different opinion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.