Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 U.S. 390 - Burke v. Smith

Burke v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

83 U.S. 390 · 1872

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
June 1998
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 3 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1998 · most notably Kirby v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad (1887), Colorado Coal & Iron Co. v. United States (1887)

17 federal appellate · 3 district · 20 state decisions — followed in 13 states

2401872188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The stock subscribed is the capital of the company, its means for performing its duty to the commonwealth, and to those who deal with it. Accordingly, it has been settled by very numerous decisions that the directors ot a company are incompetent to release an original subscriber to its capital stock, or to make any arrangement with him by which the company, its creditors, or the stale shall lose any of the benefit of his subscription. Every such arrangement is regarded in equity, not merely as ultra vires, but as a fraud upon tiie other stockholders, upon the public, and upon the creditors of the company.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The purpose of such a requisition is that the state may be assured of the successful prosecution of the work, and that creditors of the company may have, to the extent at least of the required subscription, the means of obtaining satisfaction of their claims. The grant of the franchise is, therefore, made dependent upon securing a specified amount of capital.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.