Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 U.S. 446 - Ribon v. Railroad Companies

Ribon v. Railroad Companies’s Empirical Analysis

83 U.S. 446 · 1872

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
July 1987
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 11 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1987 · most notably Heckman v. United States (1912), Bachrach v. Washington United Cooperative, Inc. (1943)

22 federal appellate · 11 district · 14 state decisions

180187218801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Russell v. Clark's Executors

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule in equity as to parties defendant is that all whose interests will be affected by the decree sought to be obtained must be before the court; and if any such person cannot be reached by process — do not voluntarily appear, or from a jurisdictional objection going to the person in the courts of the United States, cannot be made parlies — the bill musí bo dismissed. Where a decree can be made as to those present, without affecting the rights of those who are absent, the court will proceed. But if the interests of those present and of those absent are inseparable, the obstacle is insuperable.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““And when in any suit mentioned in this section there shall he a controversy which is wholly between citizens of different states, and which can be fully determined as between them, then either one or more of the plaintiffs or defendants actually interested in such controversy may remove said suit to the circuit court of the United States for the proper district.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.