Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 U.S. 452 - Kenicott v. The Supervisors

Kenicott v. The Supervisors’s Empirical Analysis

83 U.S. 452 · 1872

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
April 1965
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 6 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1965 · most notably Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' Bank (1890), State of South Dakota v. State of North Carolina (1904)

21 federal appellate · 6 district · 11 state decisions

1001872188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moran et al. v. The Commissioners of Miami County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ 'A bonus is not a gift or gratuity but a sum paid for services, or upon a consideration in addition to or in excess of that which would ordinarily be given.’ "”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Adams v. Mid-West Chevrolet Corp. · Frazer & Torbett, CPA's v. Kunkel
  2. “If an election or other fact is required to authorize the issue of the bonds of a municipal corporation, and if the result of that election, or the existence of that fact, is by law; to be ascertained and declared by any judge, officer, or tribunal, and that judge, officer, or tribunal, on behalf of the corporation, executes' or issues the bonds, with a recital that the election has been held or thzt the fact exists or has taken place, this will be sufficient evidence of the fact to all bona fide holders of the bonds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Buchanan v. Litchfield

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.