Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 U.S. 483 - Planters' Bank v. Union Bank

Planters' Bank v. Union Bank’s Empirical Analysis

83 U.S. 483 · 1872

Citation profile

175
cited by 175 later decisions
36
cited 36 times by the Supreme Court
29
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 7 district · 63 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 175 later decisions (36 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2010 · most notably Olmstead v. United States (1928), McMullen v. Hoffman (1899)

38 federal appellate · 7 district · 63 state decisions — followed in 29 states

300187218801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Armitz Drown v. The United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 175 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But when the illegal transaction has been consummated, when no comí has been called upon to give aid to it, when the proceeds of the sale have been actually received, and received in that which the law recognizes as having had value, and when they have been carried to the credit of the plaintiffs, the case is different. The court is there not asked to enforce an illegal contract The plaintiffs do not require the aid of any illegal transaction to establish their case. It is enough that the defendants have in hand a thing of value that belongs to them.””
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a promise to pay in Confederate notes, in consideration of the receipt of such notes and of drafts payable by them, cannot be considered a nudum factum or an illegal contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.