Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 U.S. 564 - Specht v. Howard

Specht v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis

83 U.S. 564 · 1872

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
16
cited 16 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
December 1999
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 3 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions (16 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1999 · most notably Hopt v. People (1887), Burke v. Dulaney (1894)

32 federal appellate · 3 district · 24 state decisions — followed in 13 states

1801872188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is a firmly settled principle that parol evidence of an oral agreement, alleged to have been made at the time of the drawing, making, or indorsing of a bill or note, cannot be permitted to vary, qualify, or contradict, or add to or subtract from, the absolute terms of the written contract.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.