Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 U.S. 610 - Crapo v. Kelly

Crapo v. Kelly’s Empirical Analysis

83 U.S. 610 · 1872

Citation profile

111
cited by 111 later decisions
26
cited 26 times by the Supreme Court
14
states following
December 2001
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 16 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 111 later decisions (26 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2001 · most notably Huntington v. Attrill (1892), Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix Insurance (1889)

7 federal appellate · 16 district · 24 state decisions — followed in 14 states

21018721880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rodford v. Craig · Hoyt v. Shelden, Ex'r of Thompson, and the Long Island Railroad Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The r-ule is thus laid down by Mr. Wheaton in his treatise on International Law * * * ; ‘Both the public and private vessels of every nation on the high seas, and out of the territorial limits of any other state, are subject to the jurisdiction of the state to which they belong. Vattel says that the domain of a nation extends to all its just possessions, and by its possessions we are not to understand its territory only, but all the rights it enjoys. And he also considers the vessels of a nation on the high seas as portions of its territory. Grotius holds that sovereignty may be acquired over a portion of the sea.’ As an illustration of the proposition that the ship is a portion of the territory of the state, the author proceeds: ‘Every state has an incontestable right to the service of all its members in the national defense, but it can give effect to this right”only by lawful means. Its right to reclaim the military service of its citizens can be exercised only within its own territory, or in some place not subject to the jurisdiction of any other nation. The ocean is such a place, and any state may unquestionably there exercise, on board its own vessels, its right of compelling the military or naval services of its subjects.’ “Chancellor Kent, in his Commentaries * * * says: ‘The high seas are free and open to all the world, and the laws of every state or nation have there a full and perfect operation upon the persons and property of the citizens or subjects of such a sta”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ I do not deny that if the property had been within Massachusetts jurisdiction when the assignment passed, the property would have been ipso facto transferred to the assignee by the laws of Massachusetts proprio vigore, and, being actually transferred and vested, would have been respected the world over.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “full faith and credit shall be given in each State to the public acts, records and judicial proceedings of every other State,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.