Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 Wash. App. 325 - Guard v. Jackson

83 Wash. App. 325 - Guard v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2012

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

140199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parham v. Hughes · 117 Wash. 2d 720 - Haley v. Medical Disciplinary Board · 111 Wash. 2d 22 - City of Seattle v. Eze · 123 Wash. 2d 819 - King County Fire Protection District No. 16 v. Housing Authority · Marchioro v. Chaney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Ordinarily, only the part of an enactment that is constitutionally infirm will be invalidated, leaving the rest intact. An unconstitutional provision may not be severed, however, if its connection to the remaining, constitutionally sound provision is so strong "that it could not be believed that the legislature would have passed one without the other; or where the part eliminated is so intimately connected with the balance of the act as to make it useless to accomplish the purposes of the legislature." Also, the court is obliged to strike down the entire act if the result of striking only the proviso is to give the remainder of the statute a much broader scope.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “as requiring [a parent] to contribute regularly to the child's material well-being,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “PROVIDED, That in the case of an illegitimate child the father cannot maintain or join as a party an action unless paternity has been duly established and the father has regularly contributed to the child's support.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.