83 Wash. App. 707 - State v. Buckley’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2015
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Dixon · 127 Wash. 2d 95 - State v. Gocken · 110 Wash. 2d 793 - In Re the Personal Restraint of King · 119 Wash. 2d 204 - State v. Speaks · 126 Wash. 2d 36 - Moreman v. Butcher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not afford the defendant an opportunity to purge the contempt by performing the acts required in the original order,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re MB“a sanction imposed to punish a past contempt of court for the purpose of upholding the authority of the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.