83 Wash. App. 846 - Lloyd v. Montecucco’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 98 Wash. 2d 434 - Wilson v. Steinbach · 112 Wash. 2d 754 - ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. Bell · 93 Wash. 2d 766 - Peeples v. Port of Bellingham · 72 Wash. 2d 587 - Lamm v. McTighe · 71 Wash. 2d 812 - Frolund v. Frankland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The line must be certain, well defined, and in some fashion physically designated upon the ground, e.g., by monuments, roadways, fence lines, etc.; (2) in the absence of an express agreement establishing the designated line as the boundary line, the adjoining landowners, or their predecessors in interest, must have in good faith manifested, by their acts, occupancy, and improvements with respect to their respective properties, a mutual recognition and acceptance of the designated line as the true boundary line; and (3) the requisite mutual recognition and acquiescence in the line must have continued for that period of time required to secure property by adverse possession.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.