Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 Wis. 2d 199 - Leach v. State

83 Wis. 2d 199 - Leach v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2010 · most notably Beck v. Alabama (1980), United States v. Madison (1982)

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

19019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brewer v. Williams · Michigan v. Mosley · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · 49 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Melvin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the individual states that he wants an attorney, the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present. At that time, the individual must have an opportunity to confer with the attorney and to have him present during any subsequent questioning. If the individual cannot obtain an attorney and he indicates that he wants one before speaking to police, they must respect his decision to remain silent.” Id. at 474 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`would transform the Miranda safeguards into wholly irrational obstacles to legitimate police investigative activity.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.