Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 Wis. 2d 559 - Hatcher v. State

83 Wis. 2d 559 - Hatcher v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably 112 Wis. 2d 119 - State v. Riekkoff (1983), 92 Wis. 2d 554 - State v. Rock (1979)

43 state decisions

140197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Barker v. Wingo · Brady v. United States · Smith v. Hooey · State v. Reppin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) he was denied the effective assistance of counsel guaranteed to him by constitution, statute, or rule; “(2) the plea was not entered or ratified by the defendant or a person authorized to so act in his behalf; “(3) the plea was involuntary, or was entered without knowledge of the charge or that the sentence actually imposed could be imposed; or “(4) he did not receive the charge or sentence concessions contemplated by the plea agreement and the prosecuting attorney failed to seek or not to oppose these concessions as promised in the plea agreement.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A deliberate attempt to delay the trial in order to hamper the defense should be weighted heavily against the government. A more neutral reason such as negligence or overcrowded courts should be weighted less heavily but nevertheless should be considered since the ultimate responsibility for such circumstances must rest with the government rather than with the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) that a violation of a constitutional right ha[d] occurred; (2) that this violation caused him to enter a plea of guilty or of no contest; and (3) that at the time of his plea, he was unaware of the potential constitutional challenges to the case against him because of the violation. Id. (citation omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.