Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 Wis. 2d 58 - Edlin v. Soderstrom

83 Wis. 2d 58 - Edlin v. Soderstrom’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
1
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably 106 Wis. 2d 368 - State v. Alles (1982), State v. Williams (2002)

6 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

220197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 74 Wis. 2d 614 - RTE Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co. · 70 Wis. 2d 426 - Zweck v. D P Way Corp. · 58 Wis. 2d 499 - Krause v. Krause · 60 Wis. 2d 143 - Gallagher v. Schernecker · 40 Wis. 2d 33 - Baldwin v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a right to buy before or ahead of others, thus, a pre-emptive right contract is an agreement containing all the essential elements of a contract, the provisions of which give to the prospective purchaser the right to buy upon specified terms, but, and this is the important point, only if the seller decides to sell. It does not give the pre-emptioner the power to compel an unwilling owner to sell, and therefore is distinguishable from an ordinary option.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'An action for specific performance is an equitable remedy and rests in the discretion of the court.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[The Grantors'] right to acquire the property in question is thus conditioned upon the willingness of [the grantee] to sell, and [the Grantors'] right might be enforced by specific performance only where [the grantee's] willingness to sell has been proved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.