Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 830 A2D 610 - Belitskus v. Stratton

Belitskus v. Stratton’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Richie v. Philadelphia · Stilp v. Hafer · Baldwin v. City of Philadelphia · Bakes v. Snyder · Laich v. Bracey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(e) Any salary increase shall be on a 'percentage basis and applied equally to all county officials except that the county commissioners may provide a greater percentage salary increase to the lowest paid county official, other than the jury commissioners or county auditor, until his salary is equal to the other county officials except the jury commissioners, county auditors, district attorneys and county commissioners.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “does not require that the salary proposal actually be 'adopted' or that any other official action be taken at the special public meeting, but mandates [only] that notice be given of 'intention to fix salaries at a special public meeting.’ ” Belitskus v. Stratton, 830 A.2d 610, 614 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003) (emphasis original). The minutes of the County Commissioners’ December 7, 2010,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.