Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 830 F.2d 1049 - United States v. Potter

United States v. Potter’s Empirical Analysis

830 F.2d 1049 · 1987

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
April 1995
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Franks v. Delaware · Massachusetts v. Upton · United States v. Michaelian

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to admit the force that converging details have in creating probability”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.