United States v. Patino’s Empirical Analysis
830 F.2d 1413 · 1987
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably 23 Cal. 4th 529 - People v. Coddington (2000), United States v. Maez (1989)
25 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Payton v. New York · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Brown v. Illinois · Dunaway v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This Court identified several factors that should be considered in determining whether a confession has been purged of the taint of the illegal arrest: [t]he temporal proximity of the arrest and the confession, the presence of intervening circumstances, . . . and, particularly, the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“appraise the [officers'] conduct during the entire period after they had a right to obtain a warrant and not merely from the moment when they knocked at the [suspect's] front door.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]o allow resort to 'exigent circumstances' when there is time to obtain a warrant defeats this important constitutional safeguard against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.