Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
830 F.2d 1513 · 1987
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 13 (§ 2 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 28 U.S.C. § 144 · 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on Brunswick Corporation v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat Inc · Brown Shoe Co. v. United States · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc. · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“bias must stem from an extrajudicial source and not be based solely on information gained in the course of the proceedings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Keith v. Volpe“With respect to price discrimination claims, the significance of harm to competitors is particularly clear.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[c]ompetition does not exist in a vacuum; it consists of rivalry among competitors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.