Milbert v. Koop’s Empirical Analysis
830 F.2d 354 · 1987
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably Taylor, Carolyn v. Small, Lawrence M. (2003), Barth v. Gelb (1993)
12 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 101 (Acquisition Improvement and Accountability Act of 2007) · 10 U.S.C. § 1072 · 28 U.S.C. § 294 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 29 U.S.C. § 794A · 37 U.S.C. § 101 (Armed Forces Enlisted Personnel Bonus Revision Act of 1974) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Parker v. Levy · Orloff v. Willoughby · United States v. Borden Co. · Gilligan v. Morgan · Streeter v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“remedies, procedures, and rights set forth in section 717 of the Civil Rights Act”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“any program or activity conducted by any Executive agency or by the United States Post Office”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A]t the heart of plaintiffs claim is the premise that the relationship between the government and a uniformed member of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force or Coast Guard is that of employer-employee, and that an applicant for enlistment in one of those armed services is an applicant for “employment” and should have his application judged by Title VII standards. We cannot accept that premise and accordingly cannot accept counsels’ conclusions based thereon. While military service possesses some of the characteristics of ordinary civilian employment, it differs materially from such employment in a number of respects that immediately spring to mind, and the peculiar status of uniformed personnel of our armed forces has frequently been recognized by the courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.