Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 830 F.2d 444 - Jg Mrs G

Jg Mrs G’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
2
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably Js Ns Sh Ch Jh Cz Kz Se v. Attica Central Schools, Heldman Th v. Sobol (1992)

3 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

1801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley · Smith v. Robinson · McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 Cahokia · Kahn v. Grant · In re Martin-Trigona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where the wrongs alleged could not or would not have been corrected by resort to the administrative hearing process.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Patrick v. Success Acad. Charter Sch., Inc. · John Doe v. Arizona Department Of Education
  2. “where, as here, plaintiffs assert the deprivation of their due process rights to proper notice and hearing, they cannot be faulted for the lack of an administrative hearing and appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. John Doe v. Arizona Department Of Education · Doe by and Through Brockhuis v. Arizona Department of Education
  3. “went far beyond and accomplished much more than what could have been accomplished through administrative hearings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. J.S., HEREINAFTER "JOHN", BY HIS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN N.S., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED S.H., HEREINAFTER "SALLY" BY HER PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN C.H., CHARLES HEREINAFTER BY THEIR PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN J.H., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED C.Z., HEREINAFTER "CAROLINE" BY THEIR PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN K.Z., "KEN" HEREINAFTER BY THEIR PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SITUATED (HEREINAFTER "DENNIS"), BY HIS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, S.E., ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, — v. ATTICA CENTRAL SCHOOLS, — · Js Ns Sh Ch Jh Cz Kz Se v. Attica Central Schools

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.