Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 830 F.2d 588 - Wilson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance

Wilson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance’s Empirical Analysis

830 F.2d 588 · 1987

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
July 1993
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Reid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · Galindo v. Precision American Corp. · Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. · 368 So. 2d 213 - Munford, Inc. v. Peterson · 341 Pa. Super. 286 - United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. Griggs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(i) by, or because of the violation of, any statute, ordinance or regulation pertaining to the sale, gift, distribution or use of any alcoholic beverage, or (ii) by reason of the selling, serving or giving of any alcoholic beverage to a minor or to a person under the influence of alcohol or which causes or contributes to the intoxication of any person; but part (ii), of this exclusion does not apply with respect to liability of the insured or his indemnitee as an owner or lessor described in (2) above;....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When an appeal is taken from a summary judgment, we review the record under the same standards the trial court applied to determine that summary judgment was appropriate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(h) to bodily injury or property damage for which the insured on [sic] his indemnitee may be held liable,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.