Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 830 F.2d 993 - Young v. Anthony's Fish Grottos, Inc.

Young v. Anthony's Fish Grottos, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

830 F.2d 993 · 1987

Citation profile

169
cited by 169 later decisions
8
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

77 federal appellate · 27 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 169 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Ethridge V. Harbor House Restaurant (1988), Rissetto v. Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 1-25 (1996)

77 federal appellate · 27 district · 11 state decisions

8501987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern California · Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Taylor · Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Massachusetts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 169 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]uits for violation of contracts between an employer and a labor organization.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[b]ecause any independent agreement of employment [concerning that job position] could be effective only as part of the collective bargaining agreement,”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he preemptive force of section 301 is so powerful as to displace entirely any state claim based on a collective bargaining agreement, and any state claim whose outcome depends on analysis of the terms of the agreement”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.