Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 830 F.3d 770 - Williams v. Kelley

Williams v. Kelley’s Empirical Analysis

830 F.3d 770 · 2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
August 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Holland v. Florida · Holland v. Florida · Muhammad v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “writes letters to his attorney asking her to file a habeas petition, contacts the court to learn about the status of his case, seeks to have his attorney removed for failure to pursue his case, and files a pro se petition the very day he learns it is late.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “he simply assumes that his attorney is working on his case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In contrast, a petitioner does not act diligently when,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.