Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 830 FSUPP 1426 - Minerva v. Singletary

Minerva v. Singletary’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2001
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Warth v. Seldin · Faretta v. California · Fay v. Noia · Allen v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “do not address the question of waiver of counsel on collateral review”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.