Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 830 FSUPP2D 372 - United States v. Roberts

United States v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 1251 (Alternative Water Sources Act of 2000)

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc. · Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of Engineers · Rapanos v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To be sure, in formulating his opinion, Martin relied not just upon his own site visit, but also upon such things as topographical maps, statistical modeling, a stream survey and habitat assessment form, and the MACTEC report, all of which were prepared by others. However, experts may rely on data from others, at least to the extent that the data is of the type reasonably relied on by other experts in the field.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Daubert sets out a flexible and more lenient rule that favors the admission of any scientifically valid expert testimony, and [c]ourts should resolve doubts regarding the usefulness of an expert's testimony in favor of admissibility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[v]igorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof are the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.