Dismuke v. Cseh’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2018
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co. · King-Stevenson Gas & Oil Co. v. Texam Oil Corp. · State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Sharpensteen · Tax/Investments Concepts, Inc. v. McLaughlin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The proper standard of review in an action at law is that the findings of the trial court are as binding on appeal as the verdict of a jury, and if there is competent evidence to support the findings, they will not be disturbed on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the language of a contract should be interpreted most strongly against the party who caused the uncertainty to exist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“vary, modify or contradict the written provision absent fraud, accident, or proof of mistake.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.