Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 830 P2D 435 - Allam v. State

Allam v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2024

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

401992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vance v. Bradley · Cooksey v. State · Ravin v. State · Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula Borough · State Ex Rel. Departments of Transportation & Labor v. Enserch Alaska Construction, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “this court must examine the connection between the social policies underlying the statute and the means adopted in the statute to further those policies. Again, depending upon the importance of the individual interest affected, this nexus between ends and means must fall somewhere on a continuum between "substantial relationship" and "least restrictive alternative." [ 22 ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “To satisfy the requirement of substantive due process, legislation must be rationally related to a valid legislative purpose.”). 66 . Concerned Citizens, 527 P.2d at 452 . 67 . Id. 68 . Id. 69 . Balough brought her constitutional”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.