Chandler v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2018
1 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · United States v. Place · State v. Jones · State v. Bianchi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Wlhether probable cause arises from [given] facts ... is a purely legal issue as to which we make a de novo determination.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Matter of JA · State v. Adams“- Chandler's bag was ... seized directly from Chandler's possession,. The bag was not merely immobilized at the. point of seizure. Rather, it was transported a significant distance from the airport to the Ketchikan police station. The police mitigated the intrusiveness of this 90-plus minute . detention by telling Chandler where they were taking his bag, their purpose in taking it, the approximate length of time that it would be held, and how Chan«dler could reclaim it. [But though] such measures might make the difference in a borderline case, they do not convert the kind of seizure that occurred here into a brief, minimally intrusive detention of property. We conclude that the warrant, less seizure required probable cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moore v. State“the collective knowledge of the officers participating in the case may be considered in determining probable cause”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lum v. Koles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.