Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 830 P2D 789 - Chandler v. State

Chandler v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

1 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2018

1 district · 14 state decisions

70199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · United States v. Place · State v. Jones · State v. Bianchi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Wlhether probable cause arises from [given] facts ... is a purely legal issue as to which we make a de novo determination.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “- Chandler's bag was ... seized directly from Chandler's possession,. The bag was not merely immobilized at the. point of seizure. Rather, it was transported a significant distance from the airport to the Ketchikan police station. The police mitigated the intrusiveness of this 90-plus minute . detention by telling Chandler where they were taking his bag, their purpose in taking it, the approximate length of time that it would be held, and how Chan«dler could reclaim it. [But though] such measures might make the difference in a borderline case, they do not convert the kind of seizure that occurred here into a brief, minimally intrusive detention of property. We conclude that the warrant, less seizure required probable cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the collective knowledge of the officers participating in the case may be considered in determining probable cause”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.