Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

830 So. 2d 124

State v. Oglester

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 21, 2002

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-08-21

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2018

14 state decisions

Relies on 782 So. 2d 408 - State v. Wooten · Darrow v. State · State v. Bynes

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-08-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The State appeals the youthful offender sentence imposed on the defendant, Jig-nore Oglester, in lieu of a mandatory ten-year sentence under the “10-20-Life” scheme mandated by the firearm enhancement statute, section 775.087, Florida Statutes (2000). We affirm adopting the rationale of our sister court in State v. Wooten, 782 So.2d 408 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001):

Since we find that the 10/20/Life statute contains no language to supercede the youthful offender sentence and because prior cases have held that minimum mandatory sentencing is not applicable. when one is sentenced as a youthful offender, we affirm the appel-lee’s sentence.

¶2Wooten, 782 So.2d at 409; Beatrice v. State, No. 01-180 (Fla. 4th DCA July 24, 2002); State v. Fernandez, 819 So.2d 945 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Darrow v. State, 789 So.2d 552 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); State v. Bynes, 784 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

¶3Affirmed.

/830/so2d/124 · .json · Public domain