Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[t]rial courts are now prohibited from requiring `completion of the intensive supervision program as a condition of probation or post-release supervision.' [citation omitted]. When Moore was sentenced on May 3, 2000, that statutory bar did not yet exist.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 914 So. 2d 260 - McBride v. State · 999 So. 2d 420 - Ivory v. State

2. “(3) To protect and ensure the safety of the state's citizens, any offender who violates an order or condition of the intensive supervision program shall be arrested by the correctional officer and placed in the actual custody of the Department of Corrections. Such offender is under full and complete jurisdiction of the department and subject to removal from the program by the classification committee.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 860 So. 2d 1237 - McBride v. Sparkman

3. “Removing a prisoner from the house arrest program and returning him to the general prison population is nothing more than an internal reclassification matter.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 919 So. 2d 989 - Smith v. State