¶1concurring in the result.
¶2I concur in the result. It is sufficient to point out the father’s shortcomings by calling his language “crude ..., reprehensible, vulgar, and degrading.” It is not necessary to use the actual words.
830 So. 2d 16
D.H. v. H.H.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided June 1, 2001
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · decided 2001-06-01
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 2002
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2001-06-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →