830 So. 2d 172 - Trapkin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 817 So. 2d 841 - Armstead v. State · Hardy v. Douglas · 598 So. 2d 215 - Price v. State · 798 So. 2d 829 - Gethers v. State · 787 So. 2d 68 - Bryant v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We affirm without prejudice to Appellant raising this claim in a rule 3.800(a) motion which complies with Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (holding that with regards to jail credit claims, `at a minimum, the motion will have to allege where in the record the information can be located and explain how the record demonstrates entitlement to the relief requested.'). Appellant failed to even reference the record. An allegation that the Broward County jail records demonstrated his entitlement to relief would have complied with Toro .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Petscher v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.