830 So. 2d 174 - Fortner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stagl v. Bridgers · Carter v. State · State v. Figarola · 753 So. 2d 621 - Holybrice v. State · 528 So. 2d 453 - Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] score sheet error is not deemed harmless unless the record conclusively shows that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence had it had the benefit of the corrected score sheet. Here, neither the transcript of the re-sentencing hearing nor anything else in the record shows whether the trial court would have imposed the same sentence if it had had an accurate score sheet. Therefore, the error may not be deemed harmless.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Cooper v. State · Jones v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.