Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 830 SO2D 234 - McKenzie v. State

McKenzie v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cross v. State · 462 So. 2d 1105 - Dumas v. State · 493 So. 2d 451 - Butler v. State · 457 So. 2d 1084 - Ryan v. State · 763 So. 2d 276 - Gross v. Lyons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Fundamental error, which can be considered on appeal even without a proper objection or preservation in the lower court, is error which goes to the foundation of the case or goes to the merits of the cause of action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “test is not whether a particular jury was actually misled, but instead . . . whether the jury might reasonably have been misled”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.